Bai tahira v. ali hussain fidaalli chothia

Author: dudf

August undefined, 2024

WebAli Hussain Fidaalli Chothiaby the disingenuous process distinguishing the decision. We are surprised by this process of getting round the rule in Bai Tahira's case (supra) by the … Web5 Jun 2024 · Bai Tahira V. Ali Hussain Fissali Chothia & ANR. [(1979) 2 S.C.C. 316] ... Bai Tahira), the SC in this case held “…there is no escape from the conclusion that a divorced Muslim wife is entitled to apply for maintenance under …

Fuzlunbi v/s K. Khader Vali and Another - LawyerServices

Web29 Oct 2011 · Shah Bano Begum, [1985] 2 SCC 556; Bai Tahira v. ALi Hussain Fidaalli Chothia, [1979] 2 SCC 316; Fuzlunbi v. K. Khader Vali, [1980] 4 SCC 125; Aga Mahomed Jaffer Bindaneem v. Koulsom Bee Bee, 241A 196; Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation, [1985] 3 SCC 545 and Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India, [1978] 1 SCC 248, … Web21 Dec 2004 · Noting the Shari'ah's capacity for evolution, and citing the Report of the Pakistan Commission on Marriage and Family Relations in support of this view,38 the Court undertook 34 Two of the earlier decisions were: Bai Tahira v Ali Hussain Fidaalli Chothia (1979) 2 SCC 316 and Fazlunbi v K Khader Vali & Anr (1980) 4 SCC 125. 35 Above n 3. … nus id card

Jubair Ahmad VS Ishrat Bano - LawCanvas

WebIn the face of this burning controversy, the Supreme Court in the case of Daniel Latifi v. Union of India [4] approached a middle path and held that reasonable and fair provisions include provision for the future of the divorced wife (including maintenance) and it does not confine itself to the iddat period only. WebIn various Supreme Court judgments in between 1979 and 1985 like Bai Tahira v. Ali Hussain Fidaalli Chothia and Fazlunbi v. K. Khader Vali held that Muslim women is … WebWe say 'lawlessly', because no disciplined judge bound by the decision of this Court which lays down the law for the nation under Article 141 of the Constitution could have defied the crystal clear ruling of this Court in Bai Tahira v. Ali Hussain Fidaalli Chothia 1979 2 SCC 316 : (AIR 1979 SC 362) by the disingenuous process of distinguishing ... nusican 電動空気入れ

Feminism and Multicultural Dilemmas in India: Revisiting the

Bai Tahira A vs Ali Hussain Fissalli Chothia And ... on 6 …

Websome random lectures supreme court of india petitioner: bai tahira vs. respondent: ali hussain fissalli chothia and anr. date of bench: krishnaiyer, bench: Introducing Ask an … WebIn various Supreme Court judgments in between 1979 and 1985 like Bai Tahira v. Ali Hussain Fidaalli Chothia [1] and Fuzlunbi v. K. Khader Vali (2) held that Muslim women is entitled to maintenance under Section 125 and dealt with question of payment of mahr under Muslim personal law. nus igp historyWeb7 Sep 2024 · 1 See, for instance, Bai Tahira A v Ali Hussain Fissalli Chothia and Another (1979) and Fuzlunbi v K Khader Vali and Another (1980). 2 Speeches of Alladi … nusi distribution history

"Web27 Feb 2024 · In Bai Tahira versus Ali Hussain Fidaalli Chothia and Fuzlunbi versus K Khader Vali caes, the Supreme Court had reiterating the following stance: “If the divorced wife is able to maintain herself, the husband’s liability to provide maintenance for her ceases with the expiration of the period of iddat but if she is unable to maintain herself after … " - Bai tahira v. ali hussain fidaalli chothia

Bai tahira v. ali hussain fidaalli chothia

Mohd. Ahmed Khan Vs Shah Bano Begum and others[SC 1985 …

WebAs this case involves substantial questions of law of far-reaching consequences, we feel that the decisions of this Court in Bai Tahira v. Ali Hussain Fidaalli Chothia & Anr and Fuzlunbi v. K. Khader Vnli & Anr. require reconsideration because, in our opinion, they are not only in direct contravention of the plain and an unambiguous language of ... Webnamely, Bai Tahira v. Ali Hussain Fidaalli Chothia (1979) 2 SCC 316 and Hamira Bibi v. Zubaida Bibi AIR 1916 PC 16 which involved substantial questions of law involve far reaching consequences, the case was referred the larger present bench. 2. Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code deals with order for maintenance of wives,

Did you know?

Web6. It is not even the first such case to reach the Supreme Court: see Bai Tahira v. Ali-Hussain Fidaalli Chothia , A.I.R. 1979 S.C. 362; aud Fazlunbi v. K.Khader Vali, A.I.R. … Web28 Sep 2001 · This view is a reiteration of what is stated in two other decisions earlier rendered by this Court in Bai Tahira v. Ali Hussain Fidaalli Chothia, ((1979) 2 SCC 316), and Fuzlunbi v. K.Khader Vali & Anr., ((1980) 4 SCC 125). 9. Smt. Kapila Hingorani and Smt. Indira Jaisingh raised the following contentions in support of the petitioners and they ...

Web8 Oct 2024 · This obligation is personal and legal in character (See Commissioner of Gift Tax v. Indira Devi: MANU/KE/0546/1998 : 1998 (2) KLT 501, Viswambharan v. Dhanya : MANU/KE/0010/2005 : 2005 (1) KLT 708 and Ambika v. Aravindakshan : MANU/KE/1918/2024 : 2024 (1) KHC 32 : 2024 (1) KLT 125). The right of a minor girl for … Web1 Dec 2004 · In arriving at thi s conclusion, the Cour t followed two of it s earl ier judgments: Bai Tahira v Ali Hussain Fidaalli Chothia (1979) 2 SCC 316 and Fazlunbi v K Khader Va li & Anr . (1980) 4 SCC 125.

WebThe question as to whether Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure applies to Muslims also was concluded by two decisions of this Court in Bai Tahira v. Ali Hussein Fidaalli Chothia, AIR 1979 SC 362 : 1979 Cri LJ 151 and Fuzlunbi v. K. Khader Vali AIR 1980 SC 1730 : 1980 Cri LJ 1249. Those decisions took ....

Webof any obligation to pay maintenance to the wife- Justice Krishna Iyer in Bai Tahira V. Ali Hussain Fidaalli Chothia3 held that “The payment of illusory amounts (referring to ‘Mehar’) by way of customary or personal law requirement is to be considered within the reduction of maintenance rate but cannot annihilate that rate

WebIn Geeta Satish Gokarna v. Satish Shankarrao Gokarna: AIR 2004 Bom 345, it has been held that the term of a compromise to the effect that the wife would not claim any maintenance or alimony in future from the husband is against public policy and it has to be treated as non est. 23. In Bai Tahira v. Ali Hussain Fidaalli Chothia: AIR 1979 SC 362 ... nushys cleaning servicesWebIn various Supreme Court judgments in between 1979 and 1985 like Bai Tahira v. Ali Hussain Fidaalli Chothia and Fazlunbi v. K. Khader Vali held that Muslim women is entitled to maintenance under Section 125 and dealt with question of payment of maher under Muslim personal law. nus ieee fellowWebBai Tahira v. Ali Hussain Fidaalli Chothia, (1979) 2 SCC 316 - Referred By Chander Prakash Bodhraj v. Shila Rani Chander Prakash, AIR 1968 Delhi 174 - Referred By Chaturbhuj vs. Sita Bai, (2008) 2 SCC 316 - Referred By Danial Latifi vs. Union of India, AIR 2001 SC 3958 - Referred By Fuzlunbi v. K. Khader Vali, (1980) 4 SCC 125 - Referred By no heat wave formersWeb1 See, for instance, Bai Tahira A v Ali Hussain Fissalli Chothia and Another (1979) and Fuzlunbi v K Khader Vali and Another (1980). 2 Speeches of Alladi Krishnaswami Iyengar and K M Munshi (GoI 1999). 3 Section 7 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. 4 Section 17 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956. no heat projectorWeb26 May 2024 · The Supreme Court in the present case quoted Bai Tahira v. Ali Hussain Fidaalli Chothia [2] and Fuzlunbi v. K. Khader Vali [3] as these decisions took the view that the divorced Muslim wife is entitled to apply for maintenance under Section 125. no heat waves for long hairWebThe question as to whether section 125 of the Code applies to Muslims also is concluded by two decisions of this Court which are reported in Bai Tahira v. Ali Hussain Fidalli Chothia(1) and Fazlunbi v. K. Khader Vali.(2) These decisions took the view that the divorced Muslim wife is entitled to apply for maintenance under section 125. no heat potluck dishesWebfBaharul Islam, C.J. 1. This is an application under Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and is directed against an order passed by the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Hailakandi, rejecting an application for maintenance filed by the Petitioner (wife) under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter 'the new nusica higles romanticas