Cit vs hindustan bulk carriers
WebJun 2, 2011 · The Hon’ble Supreme Court had in the case of CIT vs. Damani Brothers 259 ITR 475 and CIT vs. Hindustan Bulk Carriers 259 ITR 449 held that interest u/ss. 234A, 234B and 234C is mandatory and the Settlement Commission had no power to reduce or waive such interest. In view of these decisions of the Hon’ble Supreme Court which were … WebAug 30, 2024 · In the landmark case of CIT v. Hindustan Bulk Carriers (2003) the supreme court laid down five principles of rule of harmonious construction: The courts …
Cit vs hindustan bulk carriers
Did you know?
WebThe Supreme Court laid down five principles of rule of Harmonious Construction in the landmark case of CIT v Hindustan Bulk Carriers: 1. The courts must avoid a head on … WebAug 15, 2015 · Sathe has appeared in a number of landmark matters in the Supreme Court and the High Courts such as CIT vs. Hindustan Bulk Carriers (2002) 258 ITR 399 (SC), CIT vs. Gabriel India Ltd (1989) 179 ITR 54 (Bom), CIT vs. LIC Housing Finance Ltd (2014) 367 ITR 458 (Bom) etc. He was designated Senior Advocate on 23.07.2005 and was …
WebAug 12, 2024 · The Supreme Court laid down the principles of Rule of harmonious construction in the case of CIT vs. Hindustan Bulk Carriers:- 1. The courts must avoid a head on clash of seemingly contradicting provisions and they must construe the contradictory provisions so as to harmonize them. WebJan 24, 2024 · In the case of CIT v. Hindustan Bulk Carriers 2003, 5 guidelines focusing rule of harmonious construction have been directed by Supreme Court of India. Doctrine of Eclipse. ... In the case of Rattan Lal vs. State of Punjab AIR 1965 SC 444, on 31-May-1962, ‘A’ boy of 16yr found guilty of an offence and was awarded imprisonment of 6 months ...
WebSep 15, 2024 · Hindustan Bulk Carriers (2003) 259 ITR 449 (SC) and CIT Vs. Demani Brothers (2003) 259 ITR 475 (SC). It is stated that interest under Section 234B is to be … WebJun 25, 2024 · The Supreme Court laid down following rules of harmonious construction in the case of CIT v. Hindustan Bulk Carriers [7] :- The courts must avoid a head on clash of seemingly contradicting provisions and they must construe the contradictory provisions so as to harmonize them
WebMay 1, 2014 · The Supreme Court in CIT vs. Hindustan Bulk Carriers [2003] 259 ITR 449 observed: “Whenever it is possible to do so, it must be done to construe the provisions which appear to conflict so that they ‘harmonise’. It should not be lightly assumed that Parliament had given with one hand what it took away with the other.
WebFeb 6, 2024 · Explaining this principle, Hon’ble Supreme Court has, in the case of CIT Vs Hindustan Bulk Carriers [(2003) 259 ITR 449 (SC)], has observed that “A construction which reduces the statute to a futility has to be avoided” and that “A statute or any enacting provision therein must be so construed as to make it effective and operative on ... dutch unlimited martial artsWebOct 11, 2024 · CIT vs Hindustan Bulk Carriers … but can waive or reduce interest u/s 220(2A) if prescribed conditions are satisfied. Rectification of order: section 245D(6B): Within a period of 6 months from the end of month in which order was passed; dutch uniform 1700WebFeb 8, 2024 · In the landmark case of CIT Vs. Hindustan Bulk Carriers - In this case, the Supreme Court laid down five principles of rule of harmonious construction:-· The courts must avoid a head-on clash of seemingly contradicting provisions and they must construe the contradictory provisions so as to harmonize them. in a happy voiceWebCommissioner of Income Tax Vs. M/S Hindustan Bulk Carriers, M/S Damani Brothers [2002] Insc 559 (17 December 2002) M.B. Shah Shah, J. Appeal (civil) 7248 of 1999 . I … dutch us holding bvWebDec 17, 2000 · Commissioner Of Income Tax vs M/S Hindustan Bulk Carriers on 17 December, 2000 Author: Dharmadhikari Bench: D.M. Dharmadhikari. CASE NO.: Appeal (civil) 7966-67 of 1996 PETITIONER: Commissioner of Income Tax RESPONDENT: M/s … in a hardshipWebNov 6, 2024 · As observed by Hon‟ble Supreme Court, in the case of CIT Vs Hindustan Bulk Carriers [(2003) 259 ITR 449 (SC)], “A construction which reduces the statute to a futility has to be avoided. A statute or any enacting provision therein must be so construed as to make it effective and operative on the principle expressed in maxim us res magi’s ... in a hardshell 意味WebDec 21, 2024 · Hindustan Bulk Carrier: “While interpreting, the court has a duty to avoid a “head-on clash” at all costs between two sections of the same act The interpretation should be done such that the provision of one section doesn’t defeat the purpose of another unless it is impossible to effect a reconciliation between them. in a hard way